Bush: applause and boos
Carlos Alberto Montaner
Bush traveled to Italy and the army had to protect him from the people's
wrath. In Spain or France, the people -- if they could have -- would have
shot him at dawn. They hate him. However, he went to Poland, the Czech
Republic, Albania and Bulgaria, and the people there greeted him with open
arms and great demonstrations of collective happiness. And that's easy to
understand. The societies that lived under the communist boot are grateful
to the United States for its constant denunciations of the violations of
human rights that occurred in the “socialist paradises,” the Radio Free
Europe broadcasts, the political support to the dissidents, and the fact
that Washington did not dismay in its defense of the people trapped behind
the Iron Curtain after World War II.
While the cowardly slogan “better Red than dead” was increasingly heard in
the West, and while the pessimists, disguised as “pragmatic realists,” took
for granted the inevitability of communism's constant advance, Kennedy's
vibrant voice in Germany, stating in 1963 that “Ich bin ein Berliner,” that
he was a Berliner and that he would put his life on the line next to the
people of Berlin, and Reagan's voice, 25 years later, almost in the same
spot, in front of the Brandenburg Gate, asking Gorbachev to tear down the
Berlin Wall, were almost the only expressions of international solidarity
that reached those saddened societies, the only friendly hand that kept
alive their desire for freedom and the hope that tomorrow would bring an end
to the gulags and the firing squads.
In Latin America, something similar is happening. According to the more
reliable surveys, the continent's most pro-American societies are those in
Nicaragua and El Salvador, precisely two nations where the United States
contributed militarily to the defeat of the communists, and the one in
Panama, where a U.S. invasion in 1989 removed from power a narco-dictator
very close to the Cuban tyranny.
It is true that in those countries there is also a strong anti-American
feeling in one segment of the population, but the number of those who have a
good opinion of the United States is twice or three times (as in Panama) the
number of those who opine the opposite. Even in Cuba, where the government
has engaged in a propaganda bombardment for half a century now, it is
estimated that 56 percent of the population -- if it could -- would emigrate
immediately to the United States, already home to more than two million
escapees from the island.
What would have happened if, after the defeat of the Nazis and amid the
imperialistic spasms of the Soviets who had swallowed half of central Europe
and were about to control Greece, the United States had sat on its hands?
What would have happened if, confronted with that madness of worldwide
conquest that affected the communists for decades, until the USSR sank as a
consequence of the absolute inefficiency of collectivism and the abuses of
Party oligarchs, the United States had not developed a defensive strategy of
containment, with alliances such as NATO and massive programs of foreign aid
such as the Marshall Plan?
It is true that Washington committed numerous mistakes and some excesses in
the practice of its leadership, but was any other nation willing to pay the
steep price of facing off Moscow and Beijing? Even after the USSR had
disappeared and without the danger of a counterattack, when the former
Yugoslavia broke apart as the result of several civil wars and plunged into
a terrible blood bath, to whom did Europe turn in search of guidance and
support to put down the Serbs and bring an end to a horrific slaughter --
aseptically called “ethnic cleansing” -- that was taking place in its own
back yard? It quickly called its American friend.
In 1992, during a trip I made to Hungary, a young and brilliant politician
who later became Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, recalling the days of the
resistance against communism, summarized the situation for me with an
emphatic statement: “Without the Americans, our slavery might have never
ended.” Most likely. That is why in those places, the people applaud Bush
and are not anti-American.
June 20, 2007
Print
this page